Search for: "Robert Slates" Results 81 - 100 of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm by lennyesq
Milligan was so radically unjustified that Chief Justice John Roberts–an architect of the judicial attack on voting rights–dissented, alongside the three liberals. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 10:23 am by Howard Bashman
Slate has posted online this new installment of its “Amicus” podcast featuring Dahlia Lithwick and her guest, Joan Biskupic of CNN. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:44 pm by Howard Bashman
“Anti-Abortion Advocates Lied So Poorly That John Roberts May Side With the Liberals; June Medical proves that Louisiana’s law isn’t about protecting women’s health”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 7:52 am by Howard Bashman
Also online at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick has a jurisprudence essay titled “John Roberts Has Lost Control; The real takeaway from the court’s rulings on the Texas abortion cases is that the chief justice has lost his influence. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:07 pm
I have a Slate piece this morning on the subject. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:02 pm
In this Slate column, Pepperdine law professor Doug Kmiec decries two recent 5-4 Supreme Court decisions because they undermine Chief Justice Roberts' effort to promote unanimity on the Court, which... [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Jason Mazzone
Until then, let's take a look at how one Slate columnist explains the operations of the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:00 pm
Jack Shafer in Slate, Behold how little substance NPR’s Cokie Roberts can pack into four minutes of airtime suggests it’s time for NPR to replace Cokie Roberts with actual content. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am by Ryan Goodman
The Trump team publicly suggested these alternate slates were to preserve an option if courts vindicated Trump’s legal challenges. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:27 am
New York with his criticism in Slate of Chief Justice Roberts’s dissent in Obergefell (the gay marriage case)? [read post]