Search for: "Robert Washington v. D. Adam"
Results 61 - 80
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that the court announced that it “will not review a Kentucky law that requires doctors who perform abortions to give a detailed description of the fetus’s development while the woman is shown an ultrasound image, even if she objects. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am
The first is in Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “news coverage of the justices since Roberts took over as Chief Justice in 2005. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes and Seung Min Kim report that “[i]f Chief Justice John G. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow for The Washington Post (subscription required), Adam Liptak and Jeremy Peters for The New York Times (subscription required), and Shannon Bream and Bill Mears at Fox News, who report that “[o]utside the court, plaintiffs from both sides urged Congress to intervene. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Adam Carrington writes that whereas “[l]ast year, very few Supreme Court cases caught national attention, … this term, the docket is rife with cases of massive consequence. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
” Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that in public remarks last night, Roberts “forcefully rejected criticism that the Supreme Court’s work had been warped by partisanship. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) tweeted have at least two things in common: they are all constituents in his district, and moreover, they all donated the maximum amount to President Trump’s campaign this year. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:20 am
For The Washington Post, Roberts Barnes and Cortlynn Stark report that “Kagan was joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
” In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Adam Carrington weighs in on Kisor v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu expand on a previous post for this blog on The American Legion v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, who reports that the decision has “major implications for people like Paul Manafort convicted in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe and facing state charges as well. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
In an op-ed at the Washington Examiner, Adam Carrington welcomes the result as “an affirmation of the rule of law. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Adam Carrington maintains that this week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes explains that June Medical Services v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Richard Pierce argues that in in Thacker v. [read post]
