Search for: "Robert Washington v. D. Adams"
Results 41 - 60
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Timbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 4:41 am
For The Washington Post, Fred Barbash writes that “[a]s unusual as Roberts’s comments were, he could have said so much more. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ed O’Keefe report that “Senate Democrats are requesting more information about Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s role defending the George W. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]wo of the court’s four liberals suggested the unique history of the Peace Cross in the Washington suburb of Bladensburg, Md., may provide a way to accommodate its position on public land in a highway median. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that the “Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with the president’s plan to temporarily ban citizens from six mostly Muslim countries, elevating a divisive legal battle involving national security and religious discrimination to the nation’s highest court. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am
In The Washington Post, Nick Anderson notes that, although “Fisher v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that yesterday’s other grant, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in “another dramatic reversal in a high-profile case before the high court,” the “Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to overrule a 40-year-old precedent that allows compelling public employees to pay some fees to unions that represent them, an important tool for the U.S. labor movement. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Ezra Klein of the Washington Post argues that “if you’re Anthony Kennedy and John Roberts, and you want to rule against the individual mandate but you’re worried about a public backlash, this poll calms your fears. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jessica Gresko at the Associated Press, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle at Law.com. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the justices “next term will consider a Missouri inmate’s contention that the state’s preferred method of executing him could cause him to choke on his own blood and will review a kind of class action settlement in which no payments go to the members of the lawsuit. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes of the Washington Post previews Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog; other coverage of the grant in Toca came from Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” In The Washington Post, James Hohmann interviews Robert Barnes about the major cases of the Term. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Other early coverage comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Josh Gerstein at Politico; Jaclyn Belcyk at JURIST; Sahil Kapur at Talking Points Memo; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; Steven Mazie of The Economist; Greg Stohr at Bloomberg Businessweek; Bill Mears at CNN; and Richard Wolf of USA Today. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Judge Milan D. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Judge Milan D. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak notes that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “[b]y taking the Maryland case, the court underscored that partisan gerrymandering isn’t the province of one party alone, but a tool that can be employed by either Republicans or Democrats to extend power when they hold the political advantage. [read post]
