Search for: "Roger Lord " Results 21 - 40 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:55 pm by Howard Friedman
The Proclamation also reads in part:The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, penned by Thomas Jefferson, declared religious liberty a natural right and any attempt to subvert it "a departure from the plan of the Holy Author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either." [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:34 am
Rogers will discuss the proposed new Board rules and fee changes.AGENDA12:00 - 12:45 - Registration and Lunch12:45 - 1:00 - Welcome Remarks1:00 - 1:30  - Keynote Address - State of the Union in Fashion LawProfessor Barbara Kolsun, Adjunct Professor of Fashion Law at Cardozo and Co-Director of Cardozo’s FAME program (Fashion, Art, Media and Entertainment)1:30 - 2:00 -  Evidentiary Considerations for Evaluating “Disparaging Marks” Under Section… [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:24 am
Rogers will discuss the proposed new Board rules and fee changes.AGENDA12:00 - 12:45 - Registration and Lunch12:45 - 1:00 - Welcome Remarks1:00 - 1:30  - Keynote Address - State of the Union in Fashion LawProfessor Barbara Kolsun, Adjunct Professor of Fashion Law at Cardozo and Co-Director of Cardozo’s FAME program (Fashion, Art, Media and Entertainment)1:30 - 2:00 -  Evidentiary Considerations for Evaluating “Disparaging Marks” Under Section… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
It also offends against the   Lambeth LBC v Rogers (1999) 32 HLR 361 principle of retrospective   revival. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
See also Lord Lester’s Bill, clause 12. (2) Rule out some claimants? [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 2:59 pm
The pyramidal construction in the background is not a new office complex or buy to let apartment block by Lord Rogers or any other British architect of note. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
Lord Ashcroft v Foley [2011] EWHC 292 (QB). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rogers v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1459 (15 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (16 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Culkin v The Wirral Independent Appeals Panel [2011] EWHC 1526 (QB) (15 June 2011) Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011) High Court (Family Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P & Anor [2011] EWHC 1330 (Fam)… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm by Legal Beagle
On the 29th April 1991 a meeting was held between Lord Fraser (the Lord Advocate), Lord Roger (the Solicitor General), Duncan Lowe (the Crown Agent), Alfred Vannet (the Deputy Crown Agent) and persons unknown, to discuss the Elish McPhilomy report. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
A media defendant cannot, under the guise of this defence, “drag in damaging allegations which serve no public purpose”, but the court should allow for “editorial judgement” about which details it is appropriate to include in a report: see Lord Hoffmann in Jameel at [51]. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:24 pm
Here is the abstract: On October 11, 2006, Britain's highest court, the House of Lords, issued a blockbuster ruling that completely changed the landscape of libel law and press freedoms in the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Roger Stone now says Scott "never added up"; Bill Scherer says "[w]e all wondered where the money came from"; Michael Goldberg says Scott's spending "made no sense. [read post]