Search for: "Rolls Royce Corp"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Reuters noted that Rolls-Royce and Pratt &, Whitney (owned by United Technologies Corp) have dropped patent infringement lawsuits filed against each other over disputes surrounding Rolls' Trent 900 and 1000 engines and the GP7200 engine, developed by P&W and General Electric . [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:23 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., a Seventh Circuit opinion decided... [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
“Did Patrick demand a Rolls Royce defense when a prudent trustee could have arrived at the same destination in a Buick, Chrysler or Taurus? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
Rolls-Royce Corp., et... [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:43 pm
Rolls-Royce Corp (civil case) [uploaded: 01/13/2009] [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:45 pm
Rolls-Royce Corp. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 7:08 pm
., Rolls-Royce Corp., Honeywell International, Inc., and Accurate Accessories, LLC for negligence. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:14 am
United States Court of Appeals CIVIL OPINIONS Civil Procedure Class actions Where the named class members have weaker cases than other class members and a conflict of interest, class certification was properly denied. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:40 pm
Details: Rolls-Royce v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
Rolls-Royce v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
Rolls-Royce PLC and The Boeing Company, Docket No. 19-1847) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:22 am
Soc'y 74 (2011) on the Rolls-Royce case :Rolls-Royce, PLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
Rolls-Royce North America, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., No. 10-3444 (8th Cir., Dec. 13, 2011). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
And Rolls-Royce announced a plan to claw back any executive bonuses paid out to employees who subsequently come under investigation (“in the case of serious non-compliance with the Rolls-Royce code of conduct, reputational damage or gross misconduct”). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., No. 08-3593, 2009 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:12 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., the appellate court determined that the named plaintiffs were not adequate class representatives because they had weaker promotion claims than others in the class and there was a conflict of interest arising out of some workers' supervisory roles. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:29 am
But the money keeps pouring in because the companies manufacturing the device—General Electric and Rolls Royce—have traded favors with their representatives in Congress. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., 637 F.3d 818, 821 (7th Cir. 2011). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am
” Rolls-Royce, PLC v. [read post]
