Search for: "Romans v. United States of America" Results 61 - 80 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
In fact it was always the latter first and foremost, and is so treated in the book; the very office of the Roman praetor was linked to and justified by his legal mandate to promote the bonum commune (common good). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm by Amy Howe
Roman Martinez, an assistant to the solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, emphasized that parents will choose the fastest option to get relief for their children, which will generally be state administrative proceedings rather than lawsuits in federal court. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  He writes, echoing Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Many thinkers presented in Conservatives and the Constitutioncelebrated the United States as a Protestant country, insisting that both immigration and educational policy be devoting to keeping America Christian, and that reproductive policy favor conservative Christian notions of marriage and se [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
What is less understood, however, is how the new law could hurt the entire United States economy, and consequently, the financial wellbeing of all Americans. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It is a high-stakes sequel to the 2014 ruling giving some for-profit companies an exemption from that mandate, and it probably will further clarify church-state relationships in America. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:50 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The case of United States v Phillips in 2016 considered whether the imprisonment of someone for civil contempt by failing to pay child support was constitutional. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]