Search for: "Rose v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
To date, responses of AI builders and sellers to these issues vary from ignoring them, to attempting negotiations with certain parties, to lawsuits, but to my knowledge (and to the knowledge of experts I’ve spoken with), no definitive solutions have been established, and some contend these conversations are just beginning.[5] Challenges include finding solutions to data scraping for training AI models that both fairly address the interests of rights holders and data subjects,… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm
Here is what you missed last week on the IPKat.CopyrightAnastasiia Kyrylenko discussed the recent interpretation of Article 4 of Directive 2004/48/EC by the CJEU in relation to possibility for collective management organisations to bring, in their own name, actions for copyright infringement on behalf of the right holders. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Jurisdiction Summary of regulatory regime relating to D&I in financial services Norton Rose Fulbright regulatory contact Asia China China does not have an overarching legislation or regulatory framework governing D&I. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
Licenses, for example, grant its holders legal permission to use the work in a particular way. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:28 pm
” The court applied the Wang v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The scathing dissent by Justice Kagan highlights the contentious nature of this decision, and its potential impact on both copyright holders and artists trying to take inspiration of other works. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The scathing dissent by Justice Kagan highlights the contentious nature of this decision, and its potential impact on both copyright holders and artists trying to take inspiration of other works. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:43 am
Hamlet v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
“When the value of XRP rose, all Institutional Buyers profited in proportion to their XRP holdings. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
Take, for instance, the copyright infringement case filed by the rights holder to the Ed Sullivan Show against the producers of the Broadway hit Jersey Boys in Sofa Entertainment v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Scuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 at page 579 (1994) quoting Folsom v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am
Tam, Iancu v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:49 am
[1] Campbell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Confusion is not simply an unfortunate byproduct of parody that trademark holders bear. [read post]
