Search for: "Rose v. Peters et al" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
This Kat comes as a 2-for-1 dealAs summer draws to a close, the IPKat continues to offer IP news and views.CopyrightPermaKat Eleonora Rosati gave an overview of the issues at play in AG Hogan's advice to the CJEU to rule that disclosure of evidence containing protected content to a court is not a communication to the public for the purposes of the InfoSoc Directive.Eleonora also explained the legal nature of Article 17 of the Copyright DSM Directive and its relationship with the… [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG)   Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
London: Routledge, 2016.Goodin, Robert E., et al. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Prior attempts to measure tarnishment: Buccafusco et al 2016 focused on porn parodies, found burnishing except among very conservative consumers. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(IP Watchdog)   US Patents Congress makes another attempt to ban tax strategy patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Poor man’s opposition (Anticipate This!) [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by Sam E. Antar
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
  The transition to institutionalized monogamy contributes to more egalitarian social relations, greater social progress, and a fairer distribution of the opportunity to enter into family relations.[13]              Brown University Political Scientist Rose McDermott, one of the expert intervenors in the BC Reference Case, characterized the evidence that women, children, and lower-status males fare poorly under polygamy thus:… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]