Search for: "Roy v. Texas" Results 61 - 80 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00428-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-17-09, pet denied Oct 2009)(disbarment affirmed, affirmative defense of limitations waived by failure to plead it,trial amendment denied as prejudicial)09-0682 ROY JONES v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 10:22 pm
By Kevin Connolly On certified question from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, in Fairfield Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
Provide Commerce * Texas Ethics Opinion Approves Competitive Keyword Ads By Lawyers * Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuit–Beast Sports v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
The court, bound by Fifth Circuit law, rejects the motion to dismiss per the Jim Adler/Texas Hammer Fifth Circuit ruling. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Other commentary focuses on Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Importantly, the opinion casts doubt on the EEOC’s powers to act by guidance in many other areas as well [Federalist Society teleforum with Mark Chenoweth and Eileen O’Connor on Texas v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Eric Goldman
July 29, 2016) Related Posts on Keyword Advertising * Texas Ethics Opinion Approves Competitive Keyword Ads By Lawyers * Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuit–Beast Sports v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Mark Alderman
Jacques Roy of Texas is charged with engaging in Medicare fraud that cost the system $375 million by recruiting homeless and fake patients to register for care that was not provided. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Among the uses for that money would be compensating businesses that had bought Peanut Corp. products that were recalled, trustee Roy V. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]