Search for: "Rush v. Intel Corporation"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
The 2018 SEC Guidance serves as a follow-up to the October 13, 2011 SEC Division of Corporation Finance staff guidance, which also pertained exclusively to the cybersecurity- related disclosure obligations of public companies (the “2011 SEC CF Guidance”). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
Soon thereafter, companies began to step up both their processes for defending themselves against corporate attack, and their plans for incident response. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:53 am
Rush’s bill appears to be version 2.0 of Boucher’s, incorporating many of the issues discussed during hearings and intimated in discussions over the past year, and is already garnering praise from some industry players (Microsoft, Intel and E-Bay) and privacy groups. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:59 pm
Intel Corporation (April 29, 2010), Judge Conrad Rushing of the Sixth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal has authored a compelling and fascinating opinion. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:57 pm
Intel Corporation has important advice for any appellate advocate. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
