Search for: "Rust-Oleum Corporation"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
Rust-Oleum Corporation, 2018 WL 5810327, No. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 4:10 pm
Rust-Oleum Corporation, No. 1-08-2879 affirmed that the res judicata element of "final adjudication on the merits" can be satisfied even where a court's dismissal of strict liability count did not specify whether it was with or without prejudice, and where plaintiff was granted leave to file amended complaint. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:40 pm
Rust-Oleum Corporation, --- F.3d ----, No. 19-20210, 2020 WL 1808871 (5th Cir. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
During the course of his employment, Milward was exposed to varying levels of benzene from paints and other products manufactured by (among others) Rust–Oleum Corporation. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
During the course of his employment, Milward was exposed to varying levels of benzene from paints and other products manufactured by (among others) Rust–Oleum Corporation. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
During the course of his employment, Milward was exposed to varying levels of benzene from paints and other products manufactured by (among others) Rust–Oleum Corporation. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
Rust-Oleum Case Referred to FTC After Company Rejects NARB Recommendation The Rust-Oleum Corporation has rejected a recommendation by the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) to discontinue use of “2X” as part of the Painter’s Touch Ultra Cover product name. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
Rust-Oleum Case Referred to FTC After Company Rejects NARB Recommendation The Rust-Oleum Corporation has rejected a recommendation by the National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) to discontinue use of “2X” as part of the Painter’s Touch Ultra Cover product name. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
Rust-Oleum Corporation. - "Third-Party Plaintiffs/Defendants/Appellants Rust-Oleum Corporation and ROC Sales, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:25 am
NAD Finds Sherwin-Williams Claims Don’t Require Substantiation In a challenge brought by Rust-Oleum Corporation, the NAD concluded that Sherwin Williams’s ads for its “CoverMaxx” spray paints did not require substantiation because they did not communicate a message of superior paint coverage. [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:25 am
NAD Finds Sherwin-Williams Claims Don’t Require Substantiation In a challenge brought by Rust-Oleum Corporation, the NAD concluded that Sherwin Williams’s ads for its “CoverMaxx” spray paints did not require substantiation because they did not communicate a message of superior paint coverage. [read post]
