Search for: "S.B. "
Results 1 - 20
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
S.B. 12 restricts far more than obscene speech. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Here, the district court facially enjoined every application of S.B.4—even though it can never be enforced against Plaintiffs and without meaningful severability analysis. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
But S.B. 832, introduced today, may change that. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
California S.B. 1196 proposes amending the California End of Life Option Act to make it more accessible to seriously ill individuals who have determined MAID is their best option to avoid intolerable suffering. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:31 pm
The issue in the pending litigation is a law passed by the Ohio legislature and signed by former Ohio Governor Mike DeWine as Senate Bill (S.B.) 23. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See 2022 NJ S.B. 723 . [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
Well, the Fifth Circuit has now issued an actual opinion about the latter regarding Texas' S.B. 4 immigration law. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
Oldham dissented, writing: To defend that global injunction, and to take from Texas its sovereign prerogative to enact a law that its people and its leaders want, plaintiffs must show that S.B. 4 is unconstitutional in every one of its potential applications. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the dual arguments in 2021 over who could challenge the restrictive Texas S.B. 8 abortion law, which included arguments by one and three men, today’s arguments will all be carried out by women. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
The federal government claims S.B. 4 is preempted by federal law and that it infringes on federal authority over immigration. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that S.B. 7072’s content-moderation and individualized-explanation provisions likely violate the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Blizzard highlighted new California legislation that went into effect on January 1, 2024, S.B. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:02 pm
Whiplash legal rulings over S.B. 4 leave migrants, officers and advocates in limbo. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
S.B. 2022 N.Y. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:11 pm
“Texas’s S.B. 4 immigration enforcement law appears likely to remain on hold for now; Chief Judge Priscilla Richman of the Fifth Circuit, a George W. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:36 am
The Fifth Circuit lifted its earlier administrative stay, allowing Texas's S.B. 4 to go into effect, at least for now. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
But none proposes changes anywhere near as big as California's S.B. 1196. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:15 pm
The Supreme Court today allowed Texas's S.B. 4, the state's effort to regulate immigration, to go into effect, at least temporarily. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
This case presented a challenge brought by the federal government against Texas S.B. 4. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:28 pm
And there is no conflict between S.B. 4 and federal immigration law, the state maintained: S.B. 4 “mirrors rather than conflicts with federal law” because it “allows Texas to help enforce federal immigration laws. [read post]
