Search for: "S.D. Adams" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Miller, signed yesterday by Judge James Patrick Hanlon (S.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
In assessing an association for causality, the starting point is “an association between two variables, perfectly clear-cut and beyond what we would care to attribute to the play of chance. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Whether or not a corporation is “carrying on business” is a question of fact, and in order to determine whether this definition is met, the court should consider the ten indicia noted in the Adams case, and herein. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
The op-ed is here; an excerpt from the opening: University of San Diego Law School professor Thomas Smith is facing calls for his firing. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
Based upon Plato’s attribution,[1] philosophers credit pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus, who was in his prime about 500 B.C., for the oracular observation that πάντα χωρεῖ και οὐδε ν μένει, or in more elaborative English: all things pass and nothing stays, and comparing existing things to the flow of a river, he says you could not step twice into the same river. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
Based upon Plato’s attribution,[1] philosophers credit pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus, who was in his prime about 500 B.C., for the oracular observation that πάντα χωρεῖ και οὐδε ν μένει, or in more elaborative English: all things pass and nothing stays, and comparing existing things to the flow of a river, he says you could not step twice into the same river. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
By Andy Foreman A version of this article was originally published by Law360 on Oct. 21, 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
See also Adam Liptak, “Doctor’s Testimony Leads To a Complex Legal Fight,” N.Y. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Business Groups Try to Avoid Partisan Crossfire The Hill – Alex Gangitano | Published: 2/11/2020 Business groups are facing a new challenge as they look to advance their agendas in an increasingly polarized Washington and ahead of a contentious presidential election. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
The three cases considered together in Adams v. [read post]