Search for: "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD."
Results 81 - 100
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 5:48 pm
-based Seagate Technology has said it wants to buy Samsung Electronics Co’s loss-making hard disk drive unit for $1.4 billion — a deal that will give Seagate access to Samsung’s NAND-type flash chips for its solid-state drive products. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:55 am
Secretary Li Yong of the Leading Party Group of the TEDA Administrative Commission (TEDA AC), Chairman He Shushan of the TEDA AC, Secretary Zhang Jihe of the CPC Committee of the Dagang District, District Mayor Zhang Zhifang and Executive Vice District Mayor Wang Qiang of the Dagang District Government, Chief Engineer Zhang Lili of Tianjin Port (Group) Co., Ltd., Vice Counselor Wang Kai of the TEDA AC, President Xie Zhiqiang of the TEDA People's Court, Vice General Manager Mi Xiaochen… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Lee, No. 15-446 (BRI construction in IPRs; institution decisions unreviewable) Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:09 pm
(JP) - 1,220(12) LG Electronics (KR) - 1,065(13) Hitachi Ltd. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
See Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 8:47 am
Globally, the top 10 patent companies for 2022 are: Panasonic Holdings Corp; Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm
SCP is an equity company between Corning and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., which uses Corning LCD glass technology under license agreements with Corning.In these actions, Corning is seeking monetary damages and orders restraining Hebei Dongxu from using, disclosing, or permitting others to use, misappropriated Corning LCD glass manufacturing technology. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
The complaint alleges that chip manufacturers/distributors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively “Samsung”), and downstream manufacturers/sellers Apple,… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
Samsung came in second with 4,551 patent (+26%) Microsoft is third with 3,094 (+6.5%). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
No. 337-TA-634, where Sharp had alleged that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 11-CV-1846 (N.D. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
The following is a list of the top 30 companies on the list: Rank … [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:36 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Sharp Corporation of Japan, Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey, and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. of San Diego, California as respondents in this investigation. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:38 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
Griswold is a Consultant residing in Hudson, WI and was formerly President of and Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for 3M Innovative Properties Company. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
Regarding domestic industry, ITRI states that it has licensed the ‘459 patent to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Samsung”), and that Samsung conducts significant activities in the U.S. relating to products that practice at least one claim of the ‘459 patent. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Briefing: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
By way of background, this investigation was instituted on January 25, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd. and the IPAB order in the Payyannur Ring matter. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:57 pm
Regarding domestic industry, ITRI states that its licensee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and related entities (collectively, “Samsung”) practice the ‘932 patent in the U.S. [read post]
