Search for: "SANTIAGO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
United States of America). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
The challenges are especially critical in Latin America. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It was nicely summarized, even in an environment friendly to ESG analytics, in instruments such as the Santiago Principles (Principle 19: "The SWF’s investment decisions should aim to maximize risk-adjusted financial returns in a manner consistent with its investment policy, and based on economic and financial grounds. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
Moderated by Santiago Canton, director of the Peter D. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:10 pm
As EFF, Article19, and Privacy International stated in PIETRZAK v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
As ordained by Chile’s dictatorship-era constitution, the state of emergency will apply to Santiago and can last for 15 days. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court of Justice – Labor Chamber, Embassy of the Lebanese Republic in Colombia and Embassy of the United States of America in Colombia Eloïse Glucksmann, Commisimpex v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
United States, finding that the government violated the human rights of Ms. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Holyoke, MA; Armando Santiago, President) A&C Cleaning Corp. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
And NMCCA itself styles its decision as United States of America v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]