Search for: "SCA, Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Venkat Rangan
Audigier Inc., a case involving postings on familiar social networking sites, Facebook and MySpace. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:11 am by kgu
Christian Audigier, Inc., protections guaranteed by the SCA helped quash a subpoena issued to Facebook by a federal court to obtain a Facebook user’s private messages, comments, and wall postings. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
Following up on the case summary from last week (posted May 1, 2012) in which the court denied defendant’s motion to quash the District Attorney's subpoena and issued an order requiring the production of defendant’s user information and Tweets from Twitter, Inc., this week brings us Twitter, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
(If you want to know the details, see this article on the Fourth Amendment and this article on the SCA.) [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Cook Medical LLC, No. 16-127 (SCA Redux); Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Ashby Jones
’s Simon & Schuster Inc.; Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Book Group; Pearson PLC’s Penguin Group (USA); Macmillan, a unit of Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH; and HarperCollins Publishers Inc., a unit of News Corp. , which also owns The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:11 am by Alan Petrillo
Other newcomers included Safeway Inc., Discovery Communications Inc., Abertis Infraestructuras, Danske Bank A/S, and Osaka Gas Company. 18 companies have been on the list since its inception in 2005: NTT Docomo, SCA AB, Novo Nordisk, Alcoa, British Land Company, United Technologies, Fresenius Medical Care, Ricoh Company, FPL Group, Hewlett-Packard, Kuraray Company, Royal Bank of Canada, Diageo, SAP, Adidas, Swiss Reinsurance, Smith & Nephew, and Land… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court, June 17, 2010 Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19]  Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Apr. 2, 2010); In the Matter of the Search of Yahoo, Inc., Crim. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
, b) the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S. [read post]