Search for: "SCOTT B. OWINGS" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Scott Henson:       Hello, this is Scott Henson with a Grits for Breakfast podcast on September 8, 2016. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:23 am by David Frakt
So, credit is due to FCSL’s Dean Scott DeVito and JM’s Dean Malcolm Morris for prompt disclosure. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:36 am by SHG
Apparently, Sophia B. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm by Christopher Danzig
An Iraq veteran, Scott Olsen, was hit in the head with a beanbag or a tear gas canister. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Paul Levy
   First, as Techdirt’s second blog post about Wolk  points out, Judge McLaughlin rejected Wolk’s 60(b) motion, suggesting that she does not feel that she was defrauded. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
However, the problem arises when A acquires only a part of the share capital of firm B or does so only for a passive investment purpose. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Scott McIntire v State of Indiana (NFP) Bobby A. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Evangelina Cantu
This blog was drafted by  Jon Farnsworth and Scott Woody, attorneys in the Minneapolis, Minnesota and Phoenix, Arizona offices, respectively, of Spencer Fane, LLP. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Scott Kieff, US International Trade Commission and George Washington University Panelists:         Stephen Haber, Hoover Institution and Stanford University: Good policy making starts with good research. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Issues There were three issues before the House of Lords, identified by Lady Hale at [13]: is the duty imposed by s.20(1) owed only to a person who appears to the local authority to be a child, so that their decision can only be challenged on Wednesbury principles, or is the duty owed to any person who in fact is a child, so that a court can determine the issue on the balance of probabilities? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Issues There were three issues before the House of Lords, identified by Lady Hale at [13]: is the duty imposed by s.20(1) owed only to a person who appears to the local authority to be a child, so that their decision can only be challenged on Wednesbury principles, or is the duty owed to any person who in fact is a child, so that a court can determine the issue on the balance of probabilities? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
 In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]