Search for: "SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC." Results 61 - 80 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2007, sitting en banc, it established a heightened standard for willfulness that included an inquiry into whether a defendant's actions were "objectively reckless" in In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:03 am
New Company Backed by Industry Icons and $18M in Funding will Unlock Applications and Revenue via Breakthrough Storage and I/O Capabilities DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Atrato, Inc (www.atrato-Inc.com) today announced the official launch of the company and initial details of their breakthrough technology, a high-performance storage platform that is designed to eliminate the barriers to high-speed / high-volume data access, unlocking revenue and opportunities for a range of applications… [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
  In re Seagate was a patent infringement case filed by plaintiffs Convolve, Inc. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology against Seagate, alleging infringement of three patents and asserting willfulness. [read post]
30 May 2010, 12:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir. 2007). [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:41 am
The Court also addressed the scope of a defendant's waiver of its attorney-client privilege and work product protection resulting from the defendant's assertion of the advice-of-counsel defense to a willful infringement claim.In In re Seagate Technology, LLC, the Court abolished the "affirmative duty of care" set forth in Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:28 pm
American Guarantee has filed an action of its own in Delaware Chancery Court Seagate Technology has sued National Union seeking recovery of $6 million out of a total of $10 million spent defending patent infringement claims with Cornice, Inc. that the insurer refused to pay owing to disputes over hourly rates, the reasonableness of the sums and costs attributable to prosecuting claims that were not “defense” related. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:54 pm
Members of CFR include: Apple, Autodesk, Business Software Alliance, Chevron, Cisco Systems, Comcast, Dell, Electrolux, Google, Hewlett-Packard Company, Information Technology Industry Council, Intel, Micron Technology Inc., Microsoft, Oracle, Palm Inc., RIM, SAP, Seagate Technology, Symantec, TechNet, Time Warner and Visa. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Alex Gasser
Inc. of City of Industry, California; • Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd., of Taiwan; • Gracom Technologies LLC of City of Industry, California; • Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California; • Hitachi Global Storage Technologies of San Jose, California; • Jaton Corporation of Fremont, California; • Jaton Technology TPE of Taiwan; • Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., of Taiwan;… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:48 am by Phil
• International IP Law and Practice • Biosimilars and its Effects on Patent Litigation • Trademark Prosecution Best Practices • Open Source Licensing: A Review of Significant Decisions • Willfulness and the Adverse Inference Post-Seagate • Contested Patent Office Proceedings • Likelihood of Dilution • Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 Google LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
William Watkins, ousted Monday at Seagate Technology LLC, is the sixth CEO of a publicly held company to be replaced in just the last eight days. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
.'s success in reversing a $1.52 billion trial loss was the latest in a series of court victories that may undermine its chance for broad changes in U.S. patent law this year.Opponents of change cite the victory by Microsoft, the world's largest software maker, as well as a win by Seagate Technology, the largest maker of hard-disk drives, as proof the law isn't as out of whack as the industry claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As discussed in Lucent Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v.W.L. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Russell Beck
Arizona federal court refuses to give effect to choice of law provision in a noncompete: Pathway Medical Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]