Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 41 - 60
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
But lawyers for the media argued before both Goettel and the three-judge appellate panel in New York that their request was to access not the files, but merely the docket sheets. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:33 pm
That case involved a juvenile delinquency matter in which the proceeding terminated in the Respondent's favor and the Respondent then moved to seal his arrest record pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50(1). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
" Here, neither party ever made a formal, written motion for leave to file its appellate briefs, substantive motions, or other submissions under seal. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
What further clarification will the Appellate Body offer us in the event of an appeal in the Seal Products case? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:09 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit stopped at step-1 and held that Uniloc failed to present a compelling reason to seal. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 10:50 am
Circuit to return to in-person arguments: "In-Person Oral Arguments to Resume December 1, 2021. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
From the EU response to the Seal Products panel's first set of questions: Question 43 (All parties) What aspects of the EU Seal Regime should be examined for the necessity test under Article XX(a) and XX(b) of the GATT 1994? [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Concluding that Doe's proceeding anonymously would better serve the public's right to know than having the records sealed, the Appellate Division noted that: 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Concluding that Doe's proceeding anonymously would better serve the public's right to know than having the records sealed, the Appellate Division noted that: 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
In this regard, the respondent drew in particular attention to divisional application EP 1 795 246, in the name of the appellant. [5.2] Granted claim 1 of said European patent EP-B-1 795 246, which stems from a divisional application of the application underlying the patent in suit, is directed to an air cleaner including a housing having a housing compartment and a removable cover and further comprising a removable and replaceable filter element arrangement… [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
Pursuant to CPL 160.50, subd. 1(c), the records subject to a sealing order include "all official records and papers relating to the arrest or prosecution. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
Similarly, most exhibits attached to pre-trial and post-trial motions were ordered unsealed.The unusual posture:These appeals are unique in that neither the appellant, Apple, nor the cross-appellant, Samsung, opposes the other party’s requested relief. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 pm
Michael Tantillo, the special prosecutor, appealed.The Appellate Division affirmed Justice Bender’s ruling, noting that Section 190.85(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedures Law provides that a grand jury may submit a report "[c]oncerning misconduct, non-feasance or neglect in public office by a public servant … as defined by Penal Law §10.00 (15) … as the basis for a recommendation of removal or disciplinary action. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:08 am
The latest issue of the Manchester Journal of International Economic Law (Vol. 13, no. 1, 2016) is out. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
Catchword:1. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
The case citation is Emergency Staffing Solutions, Inc., Appellant v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
As a result of this incident the appellant was charged with assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00[1] ). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:10 am
Contrary to every federal appellate court and every state court of last resort that has decided the issue, the Colorado Supreme Court categorically rejected the existence of a presumptive constitutional right of access to the sealed records. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
The group argued no FOIA exemption prevented disclosure of the images and disputed whether the CIA observed proper protocol when it initially classified the photos.United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg last year sided with the government (see "TUOL" posts 1/14/13, 4/27/12 & 1/30/12). [read post]
