Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 81 - 100
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Either it's (1) okay to have weed while you're driving (open or not), or (2) everyone needs to have it in a closed container, or (3) everyone needs to have it in a sealed container. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
V Shyou H., --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975542 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.), the Appellate Division affirmed an order which directed respondent to pay $950 a month for the support of the parties' child. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
Cir. 2017) In a prior post, I noted that the Federal Circuit initially released this appellate decision under seal but requested that the parties show cause as to why it should remain under seal. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
While studying the facts of the case, the Board noted that the impugned decision did not state the name of the EPO employee responsible, but merely bore the seal of the "Examining Division". [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
On appeal to us, Appellants argue, for example, that Lee “explicitly disparage[s] pre-assembly of prior art plugs employing cylindrical sleeves as impractical and unworkable,” Reply Br. 7 (citing Lee at col. 1 ll. 12–27, col. 2 ll. 21–25), and that Lee therefore “teaches away from combining [pre-assembly] with a cylindrical device, the very type of device used by Rothstein and required in Appellants’ claims,” Reply Br. 8. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined, "Petitioner's contentions regarding his sealed arrest records are unavailing as the administrative decision reflects that the Hearing Officer based his conclusions on the witnesses' testimony and exhibits entered into evidence by stipulation of the parties". [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined, "Petitioner's contentions regarding his sealed arrest records are unavailing as the administrative decision reflects that the Hearing Officer based his conclusions on the witnesses' testimony and exhibits entered into evidence by stipulation of the parties". [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
APPELLANT'S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL IS GRANTED. 2. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
The plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied its motion to file the memorandum of law under seal because (1) it failed to weigh the public's interest in disclosure against the interests asserted in favor of filing the memorandum of law under seal, and (2) it failed to provide the public with an opportunity to be heard on the motion. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:44 am
As mentioned before, Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the TBT Agreement (like Articles I:1, III:4 and XX of the GATT 1994) are intended to strike a balance between trade liberalisation and regulatory autonomy. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:02 am
On December 1, 2020, some important new and revised Ninth Circuit Rules will be going into effect, including a completely rewritten Circuit Rule 30-1 and significantly revised related rules governing the excerpts of record. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
1. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
The Second Circuit, among other federal appellate courts, has held that the public has a common law right of access to bail hearings. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:03 am
NMCCA published new rules effective 1 July 2020. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
Festo Corp., 535 U.S. at 740-41.Id. at *10-11.AmendmentDuring prosecution of the ’543 patent, the applicant amended claim 1’s language, adding, inter alia, the requirement that the transfer member’s seal have “a first end comprised of a bellows-shaped part sealingly attached to said holder, and a second end comprising a self-sealing membrane portion interiorly formed at an end of said bellows part. [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:55 am
_uacct = "UA-1069395-1"; urchinTracker(); [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:03 am
Thus, the right of access may be denied only where the government shows (1) that a compelling governmental interest requires the materials be kept under seal and (2) there is no less restrictive means, such as redaction, available. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Peter Martin pointed out on his blog that the Oklahoma Supreme Court, as of January 1, 2014, has become the official publisher of the state's appellate court decisions and will distribute those decisions through The Oklahoma State Courts Network (http://www.oscn.net). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:59 am
The defendants claim that the court improperly (1) denied their pretrial and posttrial motions to dismiss a prejudgment remedy of attachment based on the plaintiff’s alleged failure to serve and return to court its summons and complaint within thirty days of the court’s order granting the prejudgment remedy as mandated by General Statutes § 52-278j (a); (2) admitted Longman’s pretrial deposition into evidence despite the plaintiff’s failure to file a… [read post]
