Search for: "SEALED APPELLEE" Results 81 - 94 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
We grant the appellees' motion to file their response brief under seal and Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Rules on Sealing of Judicial Documents In Cases Against Convicted Extortionist, AnotherDiPietro v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0403p.06  Chavtz Seals v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Franklin    Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0265n.06 Seales v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:25 am
Thus, the trial court's order sealing the litigation from public view violated Administrative Rule 9(H) and was thereby improper. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
Suggs points out that the court clerk's seals or certifications on the documents are not the originals. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:47 pm
Date of COS: 3/4/08 Sufficient [Y/N]: Y [06-20885] (jmw) 3/5/08 Response/opposition filed by Appellee USA to motion to file supplemental briefs [5976818-1] by Appellant Jeffrey K Skilling. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 3:20 pm
Appellee will file these documents with the Court under seal, along with any proposed protective order that Appellee considers appropriate for the Court to consider prior to releasing these documents to Appellant.United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
In compliance with that order, the protocol has been filed with the court under seal. 3 minor changes. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:45 am
If a sealed package says "6 toaster pastries" and you open it up and it only contains 4, there is false advertising - the inside of the packaging isn't misleading you, but then it's not what got you to make the purchase. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
The ensuing investigation and any potential sanctions by IPRB were directed at Gold Seal as a state-licensed pesticide applicator. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:21 pm
The Order, signed by Chief Judge Baker, concludes: (1) The Star's request for a hearing is denied, (2) Appellee's motion that further records be filed under seal is denied, (3) The records in this case shall continue to be excluded from public access under Rule 9(G), and (4) The Clerk is directed to post this order on the website. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 12:32 pm by Bill Theis
Yet the in-chambers opinion of Judge Easterbrook contains some information of interest to all practitioners.Claiming that various statements in the appellee’s brief were unsupported by the record, the appellant filed a motion to strike those portions of the appellee’s brief. [read post]