Search for: "SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY"
Results 41 - 60
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
The defendants in the lawsuit, Whirlpool Corp, and Sears Roebuck & Co., are asking the Supreme Court to overrule the decisions made by lower courts to certify classes of consumers. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:40 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. (2012) (2013) And so it is noteworthy that, despite his ruling in Sears, he has also authored the opinion in Parko v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
The defendants in the lawsuit, Whirlpool Corp, and Sears Roebuck & Co., are asking the Supreme Court to overrule the decisions made by lower courts to certify classes of consumers. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:13 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al., No. 3:13-CV-0468-D (N.D. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, 2012 U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 3:41 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 18 (1994). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. have issued a large product recall for dehumidifiers which can overheat, smoke, melt and catch on fire. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
June 13, 2012) - authored by Judge Easterbrook (joined by Judges Posner and Bauer), the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants a shareholders' derivative suit alleging that Sears Roebuck & Co. violated Section 8 by having on its Board of Directors two individuals who also served on the boards of Sears competitors. [read post]
