Search for: "SECURITY NATIONAL SERVICEING CORP INC. (S&N)" Results 101 - 120 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Wheel Pros, Inc., et. al.; Mintz v Dietz and Watson (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False marking case dismissed with prejudice for failure to plead intent: McNamara v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
Full Federal Court issues ruling in Hansen Beverage Company v Bickford’s (Australia) Pty Ltd (IP Down Under) Elvis Presley Enterprises opposition to Elvis Jelcic’s application to register ElvisFinance for financial services fails (IPKat)   Canada Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement – consultation deadline 20 January 2009 (Excess Copyright)   China Coming up: China-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement (IP Dragon) USTR releases 2008… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Patent Baristas) US Energy Secretary drops an IP bombshell (IAM) Best practices for trade secret protection (Patently-O) ACTA suppressed for national security? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Corp, Case No. 3-27-2023 JJO-VSC, two Black workers, a married couple hired in January 2020 to work at PRC’s Reno, Nevada repair facility faced constant racial taunts and slurs, including the ‘n-word,’ from their supervisors, a brother and sister. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For this blog, Theresa Gabaldon analyzes Wednesday’s opinion in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
  Moreover, this content-specific and permanent restraint on speech effectively shields the Commission’s allegations from criticism: as long as you live, you are bound not only to say nothing that the Commission believes “directly or indirectly” denies the complaint’s allegations, but you also must never say anything that even “create[s] the impression” of a denial.[23]  Given the obvious First Amendment ramifications of the… [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]