Search for: "SEIU Healthcare Employees Union, District 1199"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
United Healthcare Workers East, the court was asked to consider an employer’s appeal of the trial court’s decision denying its RICO Act claims against the United Healthcare Workers East SEIU 1199, New England Health Care Employees Union, and the Service Employees International Union. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 7:51 am
The Las Vegas Review- Journal reports on the award here, and links to Arbitrator Eisenmenger's award here.No Boys Market Injunction to stop increased health care costsThe District Court in New Jersey has denied a request for an injunction pending arbitration sought by 1199 SEIU Healthcare Workers East. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:43 am
On May 17, 2011, the NLRB announced here that Connecticut nursing home operator Spectrum Healthcare has agreed to settle a NLRB case involving multiple allegations of unlawful suspensions, discharges and unilateral changes in violation of the National Labor Relations Act and other federal labor laws by offering reinstatement and back pay to all discharged and striking workers and signing a new three-year collective bargaining agreement with its employees’… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:14 am
Although the hospital showed that the refusal to accept voluntary overtime would make scheduling more challenging, in view of the various staffing alternatives, it failed to establish irreparable reputational harm flowing from patient diversions, a federal district court in Rhode Island ruled (New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199, SEIU v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
Complaint filed by SEIU 1199, New Jersey Health Care Union; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The General Counsel alleged in the complaint that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) by processing a grievance filed by a union that was not the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit employees, but never pursued the allegation at the hearing or in subsequent submissions. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
[www.nlrb.gov] The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's decision and supplemental decision following the Board's remand for further consideration in light of its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., 348 NLRB 686 (2006), Croft Metals, Inc., 348 NLRB 717 (2006) and Golden Crest Healthcare Center, 348 NLRB 727 (2006). [read post]
