Search for: "SETH ABRAHAMS"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Philly Voiceput it, “While in office, Abraham obtained 108 death sentences. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
In an earlier piece by Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman, Is the President an “Officer of the United States” for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
In the months before Abraham Lincoln's inauguration in 1861, anti-Lincoln men in Washington plotted to undermine the Union and derail the peaceful transfer of power. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
” John Bingham during the trial of the persons who conspired to murder Abraham Lincoln and during the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson referred to the president as an “executive officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
However, this sentence was added to the report by a former confederate general who had apparently plotted to kidnap Abraham Lincoln. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
However, this sentence was added to the report by a former confederate general who had apparently plotted to kidnap Abraham Lincoln. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Abraham Lincoln in his first inaugural address insisted that the people through elections had the right to challenge Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
An interesting issue of the journal Global Discourse, on Gender Equality in Abrahamic Circumcision: Why or Why Not? [read post]
28 May 2021, 11:19 am
But Philadelphians showed that they are ready — and hungry — for a different approach to criminal law, and that the old way championed by the likes of Lynne Abraham and Frank Rizzo will no longer be tolerated. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It seems likely that if and when President Trump is put on trial in the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors, his lawyers will argue that the president was exercising his First Amendment right to free speech in the weeks after the election—and, as a consequence, his words cannot form the basis of an impeachable offense. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has suggested that the president is not an “officer of the United States,” in which case the presidency would not be a triggering office. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman made this case, and I have yet to see anyone respond. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
Sen. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
New federal bill seeks to stop high-speed animal slaughter and meat processing during COVID-19 kblocher@hslf.org Thu, 07/09/2020 - 19:03 New federal bill seeks to stop high-speed animal slaughter and meat processing during COVID-19 The Safe Line Speeds in COVID-19 Act would slow down line speeds to protect workers, animals, consumers WASHINGTON (July 9, 2020)—A coalition of animal welfare, consumer safety and worker rights organizations commend U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
[DOJ’s Schrödinger’s Briefs in the Emoluments Clauses litigation are in tension with a 2009 OLC Opinion] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] In a recent post, we explained that the Congressional Research Service ("CRS") has shifted its position concerning the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) The foreign emoluments clause provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:51 am
Lee Cowan on Paul Simon; Erin Moriarity; Seth Doane; Steve Hartman. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
Over a year ago, Seth Barrett Tillman challenged the conventional teaching on Merryman in a couple short essays on SSRN (here and here) and, earlier this year, in a blog post that took particular aim at Professor Paulsen’s use of the case. [read post]
