Search for: "SG Interests I, Ltd." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 8:11 am
The Department of Justice announced that Gunnison Energy Corporation ("GEC"), an affiliate of Oxbow Corporation, and SG Interests I Ltd. and SG Interests VII Ltd. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:53 pm by eithurburn@getnicklaw.com
Gunnison Energy Corporation (GEC), SG Interests I Ltd. and SG Interests VII Ltd (SGI) have agreed to pay $550,000 to resolve antitrust and False Claims Act allegations that they arranged to not compete against one another in bidding for natural gas rights leases issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
But the judge hesitated to weigh these interests against each other, citing Laker Airways, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
  Although I am not privy to the exact timeline, I believe that there is a good chance that the SG’s brief in American Axle will be submitted by the end of December 2021. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
  I expect for the SG to file a brief by the end of calendar year 2021. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
He noted that, “for now Canadian law appears quite settled that extrinsic evidence is not relevant to claim construction”: I would expect that SG’s argument would never have made it to a trial in the US where the principle of file wrapper estoppel applies. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  The Gov’t CVSG brief was filed by folks at the DOJ SG’s. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am by Dennis Crouch
  We are now awaiting those views, and I expect that the SG’s brief will give us the best clue as to the likely outcome. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
 SG Donald Verrilli has stepped down with former deputy Ian Gershengorn now serving as Acting SG. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The most interesting was submitted by Profs. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm by Robert P. Merten III and Mike Le
Franchise Tax Board (California Court of Appeal opinion against the FTB finding that taxpayer’s passive holding of a 0.2% membership interest, with no right of control over the business affairs of the LLC, was insufficient to meet California’s doing business standard).31 FTB Notice 2017-01 (informing taxpayers and their representatives that the FTB will follow Swart only in situations with the same facts—i.e., 0.2 % membership interest).32 Appeal of Satview… [read post]