Search for: "SHIELDS et al v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Industry lobbied for this change to shield themselves from uncapped economic damages of civil litigation. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Pipeline Flex Embolization Device and Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology have been recalled by Medtronic due to the risk of fractures or breaks in the device’s delivery system. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
I have seen security of costs used as both a sword and shield. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm by m zamora
In the cases found on Pacer, such as Sheppard et al v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:29 am by Eric Caligiuri
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:15-cv-1455-WCB (EDTX October 16, 2017 Order), a Federal District Court recently invalidated several patents covering Allergan’s dry-eye drug Restasis. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:29 am by Eric Caligiuri
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:15-cv-1455-WCB (EDTX October 16, 2017 Order), a Federal District Court recently invalidated several patents covering Allergan’s dry-eye drug Restasis. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
In the USA, despite a $25 million rebuke by a federal jury in December 2015 for contributing to piracy on its Internet service, Music publisher BMG said that Cox Communications had not learned its lesson. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Does this mean that satire is also permitted, because the term “parody” encompasses what Posner et al. would call “weapon parody” (i.e satire)? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by Howard Knopf
See Ariel Katz’s “game theory” analysis in his blog.I have been provided with a copy of a very interesting and widely distributed email dated April 16, 2012 (the date the agreement was announced) that was sent to presidents of Canadian universities et al by Paul Davidson, President of AUCC. [read post]