Search for: "SHORTER v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
Here is my list of suggestions for areas which might need to be examined in the shorter term, grouped loosely under the headings of the main EU Directives:Copyright term. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
At least when a similar extension was being contemplated in the USA, it was openly acknowledged that the driving force behind such changes were the large business interests such as the Disney Corporation. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
USA, Inc., 557 F.3d 1346 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
" [Atari Games Corp. v Nintendo of America, Inc., 897 F.2d 1572, 1576 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In LICRA v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
L.R. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
Francis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:00 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Thus, cancer risk of a continuous low dose over a lifetime would be equivalent to the cancer risk associated with an identical cumulative exposure averaged over a shorter duration. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
And in cases where punitive damages are sought, consolidation of multiple plaintiffs into one trial is, in our view, a per se violation of Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
This is not normally how settlements are done – even at the Copyright Board.The deal represents about a 50% (or even an 800% based upon the existing minimum rate) increase over the current rates, which should have gone significantly down rather than up after the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The UofT/UWO licenses at least had the virtue of a much shorter minimum term - namely until the end of 2013. [read post]
