Search for: "SMITH v. MERCK & CO., INC." Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
 She has authored and co-authored numerous books including the How to Understand Statutes and Regulations, Annotated Federal Interpretation Act, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Canada, and Updating Statutes and Regulations for all Canadian Jurisdictions. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Phillips and McCauley had a falling-out, and Phillips started posting allegations that McCauley was actually soft on the anti-vaccination movement and was actually "shillin for Merck"; part of his rhetoric was that anti-vaccination people had to save Ella from McCauley, who wasn't adequately protecting her from the evils of vaccines. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
  This principle could certainly apply to innovator manufacturers as well in circumstances where the manufacturer could not make the proposed changes without government assistance.Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Merck & Co., 948 A.2d 587 (N.J. 2008) (blogged here)). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the court in an unpublished opinion denied without prejudice the pharmaceutical giant’s motion to dismiss and/or strike the claims (Smith v Merck & Co, Inc, October 8, 2014, Pisano, J). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
I have no connection to Merck & Co., nor would I have any reason to believe that someone had previously searched for me in connection with Merck. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
I have no connection to Merck & Co., nor would I have any reason to believe that someone had previously searched for me in connection with Merck. [read post]