Search for: "SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Sony Computer Entertainment America, SETTLED (E.D. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm by Marie Louise
Does 1-1000 (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Mass copyright litigation: Another court gets it right: Nu Image v Does 1-23,322 (Electronic Frontier Foundation) 9th Circuit upholds lower court finding of no copyright infringement in case concerning Sony PS2 and PSP game ‘God of War’: Dath v Sony Computer Entertainment America (IPblog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps CYBERsitter – Suing China in a US court: Notes from… [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:11 am by Stefanie Levine
Sony Challenge To Olympic Developments Internet Game Patent, Among Reexamination Requests Filed Week Of MAY 23, 2011 Sony Computer Entertainment America and Sony requested reexamination of a patent for a remote control device for Internet games, licensed to Olympic Developments, AG. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Stefanie Levine
  Filed September 16, 2010 by Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Jim Singer
Indeed,  courts have found no infringement in prior cases where games used similar elements such as the general plot (see Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court, which seems to have been pretty annoyed by this litigation deathmatch, cited Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
.: (IPBiz), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector); and Recording Industry Association of America - RIAA copyright infringement suit against Mr Howell for copying music to his computer and the surrounding controversy: (Patry Copyright Blog), (more related coverage from Patry Copyright Blog), (China Hearsay), (IP Central), GlobalElectronic filing - WIPO's latest notice concerning the Hague system for the international registration of industrial designs: (IPKat),Five… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v Dudas (Patent Docs)… [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: Are you suggesting that students on their home computer or laptop purchase or download these tools to break encryption for preparation for homework or is that done in the classroom/computer lab where there is supervision to help them understand the parameters in the law? [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:44 pm
A federal jury found in 2003 that eBay had infringed MercExchange LLC's patent. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]