Search for: "STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER" Results 81 - 100 of 233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
Holder, in which the Court struck down the formula used to determine which state and local governments must comply with the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act, “suggests he might not step in to save the health law this time. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Florian Mueller
Some of the preferred districts for patent holders (Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Texas, Eastern District of Virginia) would probably not have been defensible choices as they are merely target markets for Pfizer and BioNTech just like, say, the Southern District of Alabama. [read post]
    Unfortunately, in 2013, the Supreme Court crippled one of the most effective protections of that act in its Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Thus, “politically sanctioned nullification of voter rights was commonplace in Alabama and many other southern states. [read post]