Search for: "STATE OF FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
Aston Martin, et al. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
HOWARD SAFIR, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., 99 F. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
Secretary, Department of Corrections, et. al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Dell Inc., et. al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Dell Inc., et. al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
The Walt Disney Company, et. al. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
Brief for respondent Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Title: McNeill, Clifton T. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Hildreth, et al. 27 Pace Envtl. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Ford Ironman Florida, f.k.a. [read post]
