Search for: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EL" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 5:30 am by Joel R. Brandes
North Carolina, 2018) the district court found that Petitioner established by preponderance of the evidence a prima facie case warranting the return of V.S.G.M., a minor to El Salvador. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
His expenses included the costs he incurred in purchasing a visa and passport to travel to the United States ($219.00), a round trip flight from El Salvador ($777.60), a one-way flight to El Salvador for the child ($426.60), and his lodging in North Carolina during the custody exchange of the child ($641.00). [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am by Bob Farb
Jeff Welty in his post here yesterday discussed last week’s North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling in State v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am by Bob Farb
Jeff Welty in his post here yesterday discussed last week’s North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling in State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
At the same time, Maria and the daughters briefly stayed with her brother, Oscar Funes, in North Carolina. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm by John Rubin
In cases in which defendants have sought to rely on justification as a defense, the North Carolina courts have referred to the test stated in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm by John Rubin
In cases in which defendants have sought to rely on justification as a defense, the North Carolina courts have referred to the test stated in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
North Carolina Supreme Court Finds a Batson Violation – For the First Time Since 1986 In a 4 to 3 ruling last week, the state high court in State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A South Carolina lawyer will ask the Supreme Court to rename Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150611 (WD NC, Sept. 15, 2017), a North Carolina federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his efforts to reinstate separate religious services for Jehovah's Witnesses.In Neely-Bey Tarik-El v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although the court is not required to engage in any particular litany when allocuting the defendant, due process mandates that the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant as held in North Carolina v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]