Search for: "STEPHENS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
It proposes to dismantle or radically overhaul the Departments of Justice and State; eliminate the Departments of Homeland Security, Education, and Commerce; radically repurpose other agencies; and eviscerate the professional civil service. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Response #5: Other Treasury Department rolls from the Early Republic did not address the Sinecure Clause Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and this staff prepared more than a few lists during Hamilton's tenure. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Jutta Brunnee and Stephen J. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Even if a final rule is immediately challenged and/or enjoined, employers should consider the FTC’s (and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s) hostile posture toward agreements that can restrict labor market competition. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Department of Defense. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
On January 29, 2024, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu spoke at the University of Michigan Stephen M. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
Dr Baran is the barrister who represented the UKIPO in the case appealed by Dr Stephen Thaler, creator of AI machine, Dabus. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:08 am
UBS Securities, LLC Status: Briefed, Argued and Awaiting Decision On October 10, 2023, the Justices heard oral arguments in Murray v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
The Constitution, as Chief Justice Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:17 am
Overview Following a decision by the Department of Justice (“DoJ”) to recall a prisoner Stephen Hilland (“Mr Hilland”), questions were raised to the courts as to whether it was (a) discriminatory and (b) a breach of human rights to apply a lower threshold test to a prisoner on licence subject to a determinate custodial sentence, in comparison to the threshold used on prisoners subject to a different type of sentence. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
" Consider the claim in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
” Johnson did quote him, with the caption: “Do you agree with this radical [social justice warrior] from BC’s English Department? [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:58 pm
In two previous posts (here and here) I've pointed out some erroneous arguments by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in its reply brief filed in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
