Search for: "SUMMIT FOOD SERVICES INC"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
16 Business models and incentives: How should we approach business models that are premised on or incentivize persistent tracking and surveillance, especially for products or services that consumers may not be able to reasonably avoid? [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:57 am
<> Nothing We're Tracking Today (click for the complete Energy & EPA announcements) Great Lakes News <> Asian Carp Would Have Adequate Food to Survive in Lake Erie - If invasive bighead carp and silver carp spread into Lake Erie, there would be enough food available for these species of Asian carp to survive, according to a new study by the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
About the authors:Mike Taylor got his start in food safety at the FDA as a staff attorney (1976-80) and served as the FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Policy (1991-94) before moving to the USDA where he served as Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service and Acting Under Secretary for Food Safety (1994-96). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:17 am
Fairmont Food Co., 74 N.J. 588, 596-97 (1977).] [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:34 am
Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) announced more than $3.8 million in funding to support grants focused on using nanotechnology to find solutions to societal challenges such as food security, nutrition, food safety, and environmental protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:11 am
Dustin Grinstead, Wayne Domin, Sysco Chicago, Inc., Sysco Food Services Chicago, Inc., No. 09 L 76 (DeKalb County, Illinois). [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
CENTRAL CARTHAGE MO-Missouri 45 CONVENIENT STORE SERVICES 1825 INDUSTRIAL DR P O BOX 875 CARTHAGE MO-Missouri 46 RAMEY #16 91 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:39 pm
Access the December 30 press briefing of the UN Secretary-General (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:59 am
Feb. 10, 2010).http://tinyurl.com/25pg3aj Schreiber Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm
Cullen issued his decision May 4, 2005. *** Columbus Symphony Orchestra, Inc. (9-RC-18137; 350 NLRB No. 49) Columbus, OH Aug. 6, 2007. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
<> McDonald's Pledges to Eliminate Deforestation from Supply Chain - McDonald's Pledges to Eliminate Deforestation from Supply Chain WASHINGTON (April 21, 2015)—McDonald's, the world's largest fast-food chain, pledges to eliminate deforestation from its global supply chains, making it the first global fast food chain to do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Patent rights ownership confusion - Magna and Russian Sberbank to offer an additional Euro 400 million to be offered in form of no-interest collateral backed loan (IP finance) Global - Copyright Copyright holders acknowledge losing battle for public consciousness at World Copyright Summit (Intellectual Property Watch) Senator Hatch speaks at World Copyright Summit (IP Watchdog) Treaty to improve access to copyrighted materials for visually impaired (IP Osgoode) Africa… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
Access a release and link to the complete statement from the UN Secretary-General (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc. decision in which the court held that “‘harassing conduct need not be motivated by sexual desire to support an inference of discrimination on the basis of sex. [read post]
