Search for: "SUPERVALU Holdings, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by admin
Supervalu, Inc. today and unanimously upheld the knowledge standard in False Claims Act cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by jonathanturley
SuperValu Holdings, Inc., 669 F.3d 714, 718 (6th Cir.2012) (discussing Jackson, 191 F.3d 647) (emphasis added). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, Judge Anderson intensely focuses upon the following Capital One/Mandiant engagement timeline:   November 30, 2015: Capital One enters into a master services agreement (“MSA”) with FireEye, Inc. and Mandiant, and thereafter enters into periodic statements of work (“SOW”) and purchase orders with Mandiant pursuant to the MSA. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:49 am by Priscilla Fasoro and Lauren Wiseman
” In re SuperValu, Inc. (8th Cir. 2017): The plaintiff’s allegations stemmed from a 2014 incident that allegedly resulted in the compromise of payment card and personal information from SuperValu customers. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 7:33 pm by Patti Waller
  He has filed lawsuits against such companies as Chili’s, Chi-Chi’s, Cargill, ConAgra, Dole, Excel, Golden Corral, KFC, McDonald’s, Odwalla, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Sizzler, Supervalu, Taco Bell and Wendy’s, securing over $600,000,000 for victims of E. coli, Salmonella, and other foodborne illnesses. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm by James Galvin
Steel Corp. 06366QH75 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Alcoa, Inc. 06366QH91 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Delta Air Lines, Inc. 06366QJ24 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Dow Chemical Company 06366QJ73 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Las Vegas Sands Corp. 06366QJ81 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to MercadoLibre Inc 06366QJ99 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable… [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm by Ron Coleman
NFL Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007, 1014–15 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]