Search for: "SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY ADMISSION FEES - 2014" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
/Sedgwick CMS, 146 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). $1,593.47 formula fee for 120 hours of legal work = $13.27 an hour. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 11:58 am
The defendant was ordered “to file supplemental responses as prayed for” by December 21, 2012, and to pay the plaintiffs $10,000 in attorney’s fees. . . .The parties’ counsel agreed to set Ricketts’ deposition for January 31, 2013, and, accordingly, the plaintiffs’ counsel noticed the deposition for that date. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
     The plaintiffs/clients were unaware of the barratry at the time they obtained legal representation, but later -- after settlement and disbursal of proceeds -- filed suit seeking to take away the lawfirm's substantial attorney's fees, which were based on a contingency fee agreement, as is common in tort cases. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The clerk then brought up the sex offender registration fee of $50 and the supplemental sex offender fee of $1,000, which the judge imposed; and the prosecutor asked the judge to certify her as a sex crime offender, which he did. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:51 am by Gabriela Bersuder, Stephen P. Younger
[i]  The settlement provided for additional disclosures to shareholders in a proxy statement plus $500,000 in attorneysfees and expenses for plaintiffs’ counsel. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am by Wolfgang Demino
The trial court overruled most of the objections but sustained the Gillespies' objection to the pool supplement.[8] The trial court concluded that the pool supplement was not a business record but indicated that it might be admissible as a public record "[i]f [the Trust] wish[es] to introduce it in a different way. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The trial court overruled most of the objections but sustained the Gillespies' objection to the pool supplement.[8] The trial court concluded that the pool supplement was not a business record but indicated that it might be admissible as a public record "[i]f [the Trust] wish[es] to introduce it in a different way. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Bereses also objected to Hunters Mill's attorney testifying regarding attorney's fees because he had not been timely designated. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Bereses also objected to Hunters Mill's attorney testifying regarding attorney's fees because he had not been timely designated. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
It argued that, under the pertinent case law of the boards of appeal and the Arrangements for deposit accounts, as amended with effect from 1 April 2014 (hereinafter referred to as ADA 2014), the appeal fee had been paid on 24 December 2015, since the EPO had clearly been authorised to debit it from an identifiable deposit account. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
It argued that, under the pertinent case law of the boards of appeal and the Arrangements for deposit accounts, as amended with effect from 1 April 2014 (hereinafter referred to as ADA 2014), the appeal fee had been paid on 24 December 2015, since the EPO had clearly been authorised to debit it from an identifiable deposit account. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
This is not so clear either, even if limited to breach-of-contract suits (and leaving aside the scenario where the creditor’s attorney seeks to circumvent the statute of limitations governing breach of contract by invoking a different legal theory of recovery). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Wolfgang Demino
I believe the last statement shows 12,991.But despite its offer to supplement the exhibit, Bank of America did not actually supplement the exhibit. [read post]