Search for: "SURVIVAL SYSTEMS, USA, INC. v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873 (D. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:17 am by Bexis
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:27 pm by David Kiferbaum
RockYou, Inc. survived a motion to dismiss on standing grounds on the theory that personal information is personal property having monetary value.   [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At The Least Dangerous Blog, Joel Nolette explains why a decision by the justices to grant the pending cert petition in Starr International Company, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  The rule will especially benefit small businesses that rely on the Made in USA label, but lack the resources to defend themselves from imitators. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 10:42 pm
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA) Inc., 482 F.3d 372, 379 (5th Cir. 2007), the majority cited "particularly acute" pressure to settle as justification for Rule 23(f) review. [read post]