Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., " Results 81 - 100 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 33 denying a motion brought by nonparties Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Although portions of the order were heavily redacted, it appears Samsung argued that any Samsung multilayer ceramic capacitors (“MLCCs”) not designated in the Complaint or expert report of Complainants Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Respondents Synology Inc. and Synology America Corporation to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Charneski granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Respondent Appro International, Inc. to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:30 am by Eric Schweibenz
”  Complainants Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm has just announced that is "strategic partnership with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Though the district court in this case relied on the co-pending case against Lyft, Inc. as well as Bumble, both of those litigations involve entirely different underlying functionality and the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. and LG Electronics Inc. et al. litigations have now been directed to be transferred to Northern California. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, and according to the notice, the Complainant in this investigation is Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. and the Respondents are Spansion, Inc., Spansion LLC, D-Link Corp., D-Link Systems, Inc., Alpine Electronics, Inc., Alpine Electronics of America, Inc., and Egreat USA. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:39 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In support of the motion, Samsung argued that any Samsung multilayer ceramic capacitors (“MLCC”) that were not designated by Complainants Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:43 pm by Steven Boutwell
Samsung, et al., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California reiterated the importance of preserving electronically stored information. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:18 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by Eric Schweibenz
Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order Nos. 16 and 17 (dated January 31, 2011) denying Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd’s (“Samsung”) motion to amend the protective order and granting Complainant Spansion, LLC’s (“Spansion”) motion to compel discovery, respectively, in Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same (Inv. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 4:19 am
("Apple"), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively "Samsung"), HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Doug Isenberg
Apple is also wrestling with Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in one of the biggest-ever technology patent trials as a lengthening list of foes big and small charges into legal battle with Apple over patents and trademarks for its popular mobile devices. [read post]