Search for: "Samsung Electronics Company, Limited"
Results 81 - 100
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited of Taiwan and Samsung Electronics Company Limited of South Korea as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
What happens if an unconditional limitation application is now made before the appeal is over is not clear to this Kat - something similar happened in Samsung Electronics Co LTD v Apple Retail UK LTD & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 250 (reported by IPKat here), which made it clear that the central limitation route was permissible, but left it open to the Court of Appeal, once the limitation proceedings were concluded, to decide that the appeal… [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
Samsung Galaxy, the Sprint cell phone recovered from his residence in North Bergen, New Jersey, the Dell laptop computer recovered from the Georgia Residence, and the Samsung tablet computer recovered from the Georgia Residence.U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:23 am
In support of its motion, SEA argued that ITRI improperly seeks documents that are not in SEA’s possession, custody, or control, but that are in the sole possession, custody, or control of SEA’s South Korean parent company, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:24 pm
This is what it says: Samsung / Apple UK judgment On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
”) The Center for Digital Health Innovation at the University of California, San Francisco, is studying the issue with Samsung. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:15 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Acer Inc. of Taiwan Brother Industries, Ltd. of Japan Canon Inc. of Japan Dane-Elec Memory of France Dell Inc. of Round Rock, Texas Falcon Northwest Computer Systems, Inc. of Medford, Oregon Fujitsu Limited of Japan Jasco Products Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California HiTi Digital, Inc. of Taiwan… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
What week would go by without more fun and frolics between those Behemoths of the electronics industy, Samsung and Apple? [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:02 am
As General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Business Development, of Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc., Greg served in many roles for a multinational consumer electronics company based in New Jersey, including heading up business development and directing research and development (R&D) in creating one of the world’s first handheld e-book readers. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
The question brought by Samsung on appeal was: Where [sic] a design patent is applied only to the component of a product, should an award of infringer’s profits be limited to those profits attributable to the component? [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am
In the written pleading notes, Richter expressed its intention to limit the debate to the auxiliary requests. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:37 am
The Obihai and the Samsung don’t do automatic updates and are probably security disaster areas. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
What typically happens is that the Federal Patent Court of Germany or other courts of competent jurisdiction categorize some claim limitations as "non-technical" and purposely ignore them in their novelty or inventiveness analysis. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm
” Specifically, Walker Digital licensed the ‘505 patent to California-based electronics maker Oppo Digital Inc., a company that designs and sells digital electronics products, including Blu-ray disc players that practice the ‘505 patent. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Samsung case has ordered that Apple's license with HTC be produced to Samsung in connection with the discovery for the upcoming permanent injunction hearing. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
(“Apple”) made headlines most recently for its $1.05 billion victory over Samsung in patent litigation in the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:55 am
These sectors include, but are not limited to, aerospace, chemicals, consumer electronics, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and more. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The Federal Circuit has sought to limit large awards on small inventions by putting evidentiary limits on permissible arguments "using the entire market value". [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
There's limited overlap with respect to licensors (ONE Media, Panasonic, Sun Patent Trust). [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
