Search for: "Samsung Semiconductor Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 11:59 am
Preliminary Recipients: UC San Diego, UC Berkeley, USC, Ferity Zinc Oxide Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:15 am
Two other ex parte reexamination requests may prove to be commercially significant, one filed against a Hitachi semiconductor patent (25), and another filed against a Kubota tractor patent (30). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc.… [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm
Viacom Int’l, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Patent No. 5,365,113 owned by Hitachi, Ltd. and entitled SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:22 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Rambus Inc. and the Respondents are NVIDIA Corp., Asustek Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., BFG Technologies, Inc., Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
The complaint alleges that chip manufacturers/distributors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively “Samsung”), and downstream manufacturers/sellers… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; … [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Amazon.com Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Patent case transferred to California, citing location of defendants and witnesses: Software Archives v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
- Viacom v YouTube opinion lacks heft (Shades of Gray) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records - Labels and Thomas-Rasset agree: we won’t settle (Copyrights & Campaigns) (ArsTechnica) Gatehouse Media - New copyright lawsuit involves Creative Commons: GateHouse Media Inc v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm
– Viacom v YouTube opinion lacks heft (Shades of Gray) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records – Labels and Thomas-Rasset agree: we won’t settle (Copyrights & Campaigns) (ArsTechnica) Gatehouse Media – New copyright lawsuit involves Creative Commons: GateHouse Media Inc v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:20 pm
” The complaint further alleges that Samsung has sold for importation 34nm semiconductor devices, including at least a 34nm NAND flash memory chip found in Apple Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm
(“NVIDIA”); Asustek Computer Inc.; ASUS Computer International, Inc.; BFG Technologies, Inc.; Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm
According to the Order, on April 2, 2010, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., Apple Inc., AsusTek Computer, Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc., Transcend Information,… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
James Gildea issued Order No. 33 denying a motion brought by nonparties Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:16 pm
In Order No. 48 (dated March 23, 2010), ALJ Bullock granted Spansion’s motion for an order compelling Respondents Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents and other information relating to… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again: Two… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
