Search for: "Sandoz IncĀ " Results 121 - 140 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz Inc. 1:14-cv-02008; filed December 5, 2014 in the Southern District of Indiana Infringement of U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:43 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
Apotex is second to Sandoz Inc. to propose a biosimilar version of Neupogen® (filgrastim), which is administered during chemotherapy to boost […] [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:46 am
Sandoz, Inc. 4:08-cv-00089; filed June 12, 2008 in the Eastern District of North Carolina Infringement of U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz, Inc. 3:12-cv-01617; filed March 14, 2012 in the District Court of New Jersey Infringement of U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:41 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz, Inc. 1:10-cv-01057; filed August 23, 2010 in the Southern District of Indiana Infringement of U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s determination that the claims at issue were neither obvious nor invalid under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting based on a “lead compound” approach to the obviousness... [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 9:33 pm
Sandoz Inc. 1:08-cv-00317; filed May 28, 2008 in the District Court of Delaware Infringement of U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 9:33 pm
Sandoz Inc. 1:08-cv-00317; filed May 28, 2008 in the District Court of Delaware Infringement of U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
ApotexApotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Sandoz, Inc., Hit-TechPharmacal Co., Inc., Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories,Inc., and Watson Pharma, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:24 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz Inc. 1:12-cv-00248; filed February 29, 2012 in the District Court of Delaware The complaints in these cases are substantially identical. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 8:59 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz Inc. 1:12-cv-00074; filed January 24, 2012 in the District Court of Delaware The complaints in these cases are substantially identical. [read post]