Search for: "Sandra Lawrence" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2008, 11:21 am
Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973), prominently cited by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in her concurring opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
The most recent example of a Justice expressing second thoughts was Sandra Day O’Connor, who retired in 2006. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
  Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has coverage. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Are the moral judgments that Fleming advocates—and that best fit and justify the cases from Meyer to Roe and Casey and on to Lawrence and Obergefell—the “best” understanding of our constitutional commitments? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
”              Rick Pildes’s observations about Justices Hugo Black and Sandra Day O’Connor underline the reality that Justices do not automatically take the positions that would win the most approval from their most salient audiences. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
" The brief also notes in this footnote that "Justice Scalia acknowledged in his dissent [in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appeals Board Significant Panel Decision Ja’Chim Scheuing (Sandra) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am by New Books Script
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 1 from 2012: Successions et libe? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders has filed a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a provision of federal law that requires the federal government to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages, or to treat the partners in same-sex marriages as spouses, for any purpose of federal law. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:31 am by F. Tim Knight
” So, as I said, a little unsettling: even if we do get a chance to look in the box it might be pretty black inside. * Thank you Sandra Geddes over at Bennett Jones SLP! [read post]