Search for: "Santosh Singh"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
The following propositions emerge from Bachan Singh case(i) of death need not be inflicted except in gravest cases of extreme culpability. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
On this ruling, most if not all the post-Bachan Singh cases where DP was imposed were wrongly decided (by Bachan Singh standards as understood in Bariyar).The Supreme Court delivered the judgment in Santosh Bariyar v State of Maharashtra on the 13th of May 2009. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:55 am
Prime minister Manmohan Singh and the then law ministerVeerappa Moily had talked to him to persuade him not to quit but he insisted on doing so. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Although Justice Prabha Sridevan has relied on the Santosh Bariyar judgment of the Supreme Court, there are several judgments post-Bariar which are still tainted, despite not being declared as per incuriam by a subsequent Bench of the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:28 am
Neither Bachan Singh nor Machhi Singh Benches intended to draw such distinction. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:54 am
Since Justice Santosh Hegde retired in 2005, no lawyer has directly been appointed to the Supreme Court of India. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:46 am
He further recognised the near-abolitionist spirit of the rarest-of-rare doctrine in Bachan Singh in landmark Santosh Bariyar case, discussed here and elsewhere. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
(Vide: Santosh Hazari v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:29 pm
In Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
The ruler of Kashmir, Maharaja Hari Singh, was wavering between acceding to either dominion and choosing to remain independent and neutral at the time, as noted in another article: Maharaj Hari Singh in Kashmir inherited a unique conundrum: he was a Hindu, but held dominion over a Muslim majority. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
However, the Division Bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Santosh Vaid & Anr. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
Justice SN KapoorThe Delhi High Court in Daya Chand Uttam Prakash Jain And Anr. vs Santosh Devi Sharma has held that a suit on the basis of a written acknowledgement of a pre-existing debt being a written contract could form a basis for recovery of an existing debt based on the said written contract in the shape of a written acknowledgement. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar vs. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Santosh Paul, learned counsel appearing for the appellants argued these appeals and also submitted the written submissions. [read post]
