Search for: "Saucier" Results 21 - 40 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2015, 5:13 am by Scott Grabel
Saucier has been charged with one count of sale or use of drug paraphernalia, and two counts of trafficking a scheduled drug. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response to this problem, the Supreme Court held in the in the 2001 case of Saucier v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:36 pm by Megan Geuss
One family-owned coffee company, the Rogers Family Company, even produced its own “Freedom Clip” that did the same thing as the tape but with a saucier name. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:52 pm by FHH Law
This year’s class includes: Anthony Arbucias, Graham “Skip” Dillard, Manny Fantis, Jacqué Freeman, Marlon George, Dustin Hall, Kelly Landeen, Sarah Miles, Brian Paul, Erica Pefferman, Claudia Puig, Mary Rogers, Deborah Salons, Ryanne Saucier, Scott Schurz, Matt Smith and Robert Yanez. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:19 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this recent paper, the abstract of which states: The Supreme Court has prescribed a two-pronged analysis for qualified immunity claims that asks (1) whether the claimant’s allegations state a violation of a constitutional... [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:49 am by Walter Olson
More from Eric Paltell/Kollman & Saucier; EEOC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:54 am by SHG
I understand this, and certainly can't blame Slate for demanding a saucier approach. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm by resistance
Which takes time: Shawn Saucier, a spokesman for U.S. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
(Under Saucier, courts had to formally decide both the “legality” and “liability” questions, and so even where an officer ultimately received immunity, the law would be clarified going forward.) [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
SandelDocket: 11-610Issue(s): (1) Whether police officers’ conduct is “objectively unreasonable” and therefore violates a clearly unarmed misdemeanant’s right to be free from excessive force under the Fourth Amendment when the officers stunned the misdemeanant thirty-seven times with a Taser, without warning, and severely beat him with batons, while incapacitated, rather than securing him; and (2) whether a court errs when it fails to consider the second prong of … [read post]