Search for: "Save Benefits Inc. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Gonzales, Jessica Gonzales sued for the death of her three daughters when the state refused to help her save them from their murderous father. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am by Richard Hunt
Peet’s Coffee, Inc. is pending before Judge Chhabria in the San Francisco Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California as Case No. 21-cv-07698. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, it helps to begin with what has been the most important administrative law case for nearly four decades.In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:53 am by Ronald Mann
Next week brings Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Josh Blackman
In the wake of Citizens United, no state thought to ban political contributions through private enforcement action. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: United States v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]