Search for: "Schering-Plough Corp"
Results 1 - 20
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:52 pm
., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corp. announced today that their Boards of Directors had unanimously approved a definitive merger agreement under which Schering-Plough shareholders will receive 0.5767 shares and $10.50 in cash for each share of Schering-Plough stock and each share of Merck stock will become a share of the combined company. [read post]
30 Jul 2004, 1:16 pm
Drug manufacturer Schering-Plough Corp. agreed to a $345.5 million fine and to plead guilty that it overcharged the federal Medicaid program. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:12 pm
Here's an excerpt: Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp. defended their actions Friday involving a recently released study that raised questions about... [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:49 pm
Stock down 10%, then recoups all the losses by midday, then down 15% as Vytorin, an anti-cholesterol agent jointly sold by Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp., failed to show it was effective in stopping progression of a cardiac condition known as aortic stenosis, a partial blockage of the heart's aortic valve, Norwegian researchers said Monday.Whew . . . what a roller coaster . . .But there's more:There were numerically more cancer deaths in the group… [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 11:51 pm
Four former employees of Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
A congressional committee is demanding that the makers of controversial cholesterol drug Vytorin, Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp., produce extensive data related to a clinical study indicating the drug might increase the risk of cancer.Rep. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
When Merck bought Schering-Plough in late 2009, Schering-Plough’s general counsel, Thomas Sabatino, lost his job but gained a healthy dose of termination benefits. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:05 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp., FTC File No. 071-0132. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:32 pm
Louis drug liability lawyer, I was scandalized but not surprised by a recent revelation that Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp. actively suppressed evidence about their drugs' efficacy in order to prtect their bottom lines. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 1:00 am
Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:41 pm
Inc. and Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 5:29 am
Jurors found that Warrick Pharmaceutical, Schering Corp. and Schering-Plough Corp. encouraged pharmacies and other healthcare providers to purchase drugs above the average wholesale price. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:38 am
[New Jersey Law Journal/law.com; In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:29 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:00 pm
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
(“Merck”) and its joint venture partner, Schering-Plough, Corp. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
The case is actually two cases - against Merck and Schering-Plough Corp.... [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 5:00 pm
As summarized in the April, 2005 edition of the Antitrust Law Blog, in Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:49 pm
Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
