Search for: "Scot Thompson" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION OPINION OF LORD WEIR In the cause HUGH HALL CAMPBELL KC against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED [2023] CSOH 45 Representative party Defenders Representative party: Smith KC, C Smith; Thompsons Defenders: Lord Davidson of Glen Clova KC, A McKenzie KC, Boffey; CMS 11 July 2023 Introduction [1] This opinion is issued following a preliminary… [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v Express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019),… [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Senfronia Thompson last session.'The Recidivism Trap'Our old pal Vincent Schiraldi along with John Jay's Jeffrey Butts authored an important commentary for the Marshall Project titled, "The Recidivism Trap. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:07 pm by Scot Hasselman and Nancy Halstead
In the meantime, please contact Scot Hasselman (202-414-9268 or shasselman@reedsmith.com), Carol Colborn Loepere (202-414-9216 or cloepere@reedsmith.com), Elizabeth Carder-Thompson (202-414-9213 or ecarder@reedsmith.com), Paul Pitts (415-659-5971 or ppitts@reedsmith.com), Thomas Greeson (703-641-4242 or tgreeson@reedsmith.com), Julia Krebs-Markrich (703-641-4232 or jkrebs-markrich@reedsmith.com), Katie C. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:07 pm by Scot Hasselman and Nancy Halstead
In the meantime, please contact Scot Hasselman (202-414-9268 or shasselman@reedsmith.com), Carol Colborn Loepere (202-414-9216 or cloepere@reedsmith.com), Elizabeth Carder-Thompson (202-414-9213 or ecarder@reedsmith.com), Paul Pitts (415-659-5971 or ppitts@reedsmith.com), Thomas Greeson (703-641-4242 or tgreeson@reedsmith.com), Julie Krebs-Markrich (703-641-4232 or jkrebs-markrich@reedsmith.com), Katie C. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
This is what happened last week:* When words mean what they say: Bob Marley copyrights stay where they areKatfriend and occasional contributor Dorothea Thompson reports on BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a 18 November ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, applying the principles of contractual interpretation in the context of a fairly complex music copyright assignments involving some the much-missed king of… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:43 pm by Lisa Baird
The proposed rule and the effects it would have on the AKS safe harbors and CMP rules are analyzed in a client alert written by Reed Smith attorneys Elizabeth Carder-Thompson, Scot Hasselman, Bob Hill, Carol Loepere, Paul Pitts, Sal Rotella, Susan Edwards, Katie Hurley, and Katie Pawlitz, and senior health policy analyst Deb McCurdy. [read post]
19 May 2014, 8:56 am by Lisa Baird
” The OIG now has published a new proposed rule that would greatly expand the bases upon which it could affirmatively exclude an individual or entity from participation in federal health care programs, and Reed Smith lawyers Carol Loepere, Elizabeth Carder-Thompson, Scot Hasselman, Katie Hurley, and Erin Atkins have prepared a full summary of this proposed rule. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:10 am by Debra A. McCurdy
This post was authored by Scot Hasselman, Elizabeth Carder-Thompson, Katie Pawlitz and Jillian Riley. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:56 am by Simon Fodden
And MP Scot Brison averred: They believe Jean Brault. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
In Scotland, all parties in the Scottish Parliament have agreed to a debate “on proposals for the Scottish Government to support a Royal Charter subject to it properly reflecting Scots law and devolved responsibilities“. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 2:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
Panelists: Sanford Levinson, Jane Mansbridge, Jack Rakove, Dennis Thompson. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
(Scot) Powe, University of Texas Law SchoolJack Rakove, Stanford UniversityMark Rosen, Chicago-Kent School of LawElizabeth Sherman, American UniversityStephen Skowronek, Yale UniversityEvan Smith, Texas TribuneAlan Tarr, Rutgers UniversityDennis Thompson, Harvard UniversityJeffrey Tulis, University of TexasAlan Wolfe, Boston College [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
(Scot) Powe, University of Texas Law SchoolJack Rakove, Stanford UniversityMark Rosen, Chicago-Kent School of LawElizabeth Sherman, American UniversityStephen Skowronek, Yale UniversityEvan Smith, Texas TribuneAlan Tarr, Rutgers UniversityDennis Thompson, Harvard UniversityJeffrey Tulis, University of TexasAlan Wolfe, Boston College [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Thompson I had the pleasure of meeting Kim Evans, commissioning editor of The Justice Gap blog, last week. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:49 am by Sam Morris, Olswang LLP
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, said of the appointment, “Lord Reed brings depth of experience in Scots law and practice, as well as insights into the work of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am by INFORRM
pp. 211-236(26), Thompson, Edward Superficial Harmonisation Versus One-Size-Fits All: The Implementation of European State Aid Principles in Flanders and the Netherlands pp. 237-261(25), Donders, Karen Determining Regulatory Competence for Audiovisual Media Services in the European Union, pp. 263-285(23), Smith, Rachael Craufurd Copyright, Licences, and Statutory Fraud pp. 287-303(17), Deazley, Ronan; Sullivan, Robert ‘Graduated Response’ à l’Anglaise: Online… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Inforrm, Brian Cathcart argued “it took courage for these people to sue, and collectively they made the difference between News International escaping scot free and what we have now: substantial police investigations, a couple of dozen arrests, and the historic and far-reaching Leveson Inquiry“. [read post]