Search for: "Scott Schmidt"
Results 81 - 100
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 1:22 pm
Op. at p. 7.Anyone wishing to review this non-precedential decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Schmidt Kramer law firm in Harrisburg, PA for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer, Attorney Brian Bevan of the Pittsburgh law firm of DiBella, Geer, McAllister & Best, P.C., and Attorney Walt McClatchy, Jr. of the Philadelphia law firm of McClatchy & Associates for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
’” As such, the trial court’s decision that the UIM carrier was entitled to a credit in the amount of the tortfeasor’s policy limits was affirmed.Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Anyone wishing to view the Opinion may click this link:http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/A08027_13.pdf I send thanks to Attorney Joe Walsh of Walsh Pancio in Lansdale, PA, Attorney Scott Cooper of Schmidt Kramer in Harrisburg, PA, and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer, as well as Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
The court also noted that evidence of a Defendant's not stopping for an accident was not admissible for alleged impeachment purposes in this case since such evidence had little or no probative value and was extremely prejudicial where the Defendant admitted liability.Anyone desiring a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:00 am
Crosby of the Harrisburg, PA office of Handler, Henning & Rosenberg LLP (Attorney Rosenberg of that office represented the injured party insured), as well as to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 2:33 am
As such,, the insured receive the higher coverage because the form was not sign until after the accident in question.Anyone wishing to review this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:15 pm
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer, P.C. for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:30 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
For a listing of previous Tort Talk posts on the Regular Use Exclusion, click HERE I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:11 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
of the Philadelphia office of Cozen & O'Connor and Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
The court felt that any potential confusion or prejudice could be addressed by way of jury instructions and argument of counsel.The court otherwise ruled on a separate motion that the plaintiff would be allowed to pursue a recovery of her co-pays and deductible related to medical expenses as those expenses were not "paid or payable" as defined by Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility law.Anyone wishing to review Judge Munley's decision in the Rodkey case may click… [read post]
