Search for: "Scott v. King" Results 81 - 100 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am by MBettman
  That case was argued by attorney Scott King, who also argued the Burd case for Wells Fargo at the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am by Conor McEvily
Finally, in an op-ed for CNN, Scott Berkowitz discusses Maryland v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:24 am by Michael Risch
Tim Scott (King & Spalding) has published The Availability of Post-Sale Contractual Restrictions in the Wake of Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
Jacobsen (Voting Rights; Voter Legislation) King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
”   "May Donoghue of Donoghue v Stevenson fame is finally getting the recognition she undoubtedly deserves. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:23 am by Alicia Feichtmeir
Ct. 2811, 177 L.Ed.2d 493 (2011) (finding that Washington’s public records act authorized the release of the names of voters who signed referendum petitions); King County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Here is our latest weekly installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… Last September, DietGoal Innovations sued a who's-who of fast food companies (such as McDonalds and Burger King), plus Google, for infringement of a computerized menu patent: U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Here is our latest weekly installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… Last September, DietGoal Innovations sued a who's-who of fast food companies (such as McDonalds and Burger King), plus Google, for infringement of a computerized menu patent: U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am by Amy Howe
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
Perez Moya v City of New York (9 Misc 3d 332 Sup Ct, Kings County 2005)(Superintendent's knowledge of the residency of child imputed to the City); Polidori v Societe Generale Group., 236 NYLJ 112 (Sup Ct NY County 2006) (Knowledge of sexual harassment will be imputed to employer if supervisor of a sufficiently high level is aware of the harassment), affd, 39 AD3d 404 (1st Dept 2007). [read post]